<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rambles &#187; Gauntanamo Bay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rambles.bearcircle.net/tag/gauntanamo-bay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rambles.bearcircle.net</link>
	<description>Programming, Poker, and Politics.  Just Another voice in the electronic wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:12:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A step forward for Gitmo Transparency</title>
		<link>http://rambles.bearcircle.net/2009/06/01/a-step-forward-for-gitmo-transparency/</link>
		<comments>http://rambles.bearcircle.net/2009/06/01/a-step-forward-for-gitmo-transparency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gauntanamo Bay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rambles.bearcircle.net/2009/06/01/a-step-forward-for-gitmo-transparency/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m pleased to see more transparency coming to the Guantanamo Bay proceedings.  It&#8217;s about time.&#160; The unclassified evidence used to justify continued incarceration of over 100 detainees at Guantanamo Bay must be filed with the court within one month and the U.S. government has to&#160; apply for court approval to keep specific information secret.
U.S. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pleased to see more <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN01458519">transparency coming to the Guantanamo Bay proceedings</a>.  It&#8217;s about time.&nbsp; The unclassified evidence used to justify continued incarceration of over 100 detainees at Guantanamo Bay must be filed with the court within one month and the U.S. government has to&nbsp; apply for court approval to keep specific information secret.<br />
<blockquote>U.S. District Judge Thomas Hogan ruled the government cannot keep the documents known as factual returns from public disclosure and must seek court approval to keep specific information secret.</p>
<p>&#8220;Public interest in Guantanamo Bay generally and these proceedings specifically has been unwavering,&#8221; Hogan wrote. &#8220;Publicly disclosing the factual returns would enlighten the citizenry and improve perceptions of the proceedings&#8217; fairness.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rambles.bearcircle.net/2009/06/01/a-step-forward-for-gitmo-transparency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Even Bother?</title>
		<link>http://rambles.bearcircle.net/2008/08/09/why-even-bother/</link>
		<comments>http://rambles.bearcircle.net/2008/08/09/why-even-bother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gauntanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rambles.bearcircle.net/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is the Defense Department and Bush Administration even going through the motions of the military commissions for the Guantanamo Bay detainees if they are seriously talking about not releasing them after they are acquitted or have served out their sentences:
Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman, said it has always been the Defense Department&#8217;s position that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the Defense Department and Bush Administration even going through the motions of the military commissions for the Guantanamo Bay detainees if they are seriously talking about not releasing them after they are acquitted or have served out their sentences:</p>
<blockquote><p>Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman, said it has always been the Defense Department&#8217;s position that detainees could be held as enemy combatants even after acquittal at military commissions or after serving a prison sentence. &#8220;That&#8217;s always been on our minds in terms of a scenario we could face,&#8221; he said. &#8220;He will serve his time for the conviction and then he will still be an enemy combatant, and as an enemy combatant the process for potential transfer or release will apply.&#8221;<br />
<small></small><small>&#8211; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/08/09/ST2008080900876.html">http</a><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/08/09/ST2008080900876.html">://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/08/09/ST2008080900876.htm</a><br />
</small></p></blockquote>
<p>Having demolished the prestige and respect of the United States on the world stage, <span style="font-weight: bold;">now</span> they start worrying about how their actions will look?</p>
<blockquote><p>Defense Department officials said there are concerns about the public perception of holding Hamdan after his prison term runs out, because it could label the military commissions a &#8220;show process&#8221; with no meaning to its sentences. They also worry about possible precedents that could be set in U.S. courts if Hamdan&#8217;s attorneys immediately file a habeas corpus petition seeking his release in five months. Hamdan previously won a Supreme Court case that invalidated the Bush administration&#8217;s earlier military commissions procedures. <small></small><small>&#8211; ibid</small></p></blockquote>
<p>I almost hope they do decide to detain him and Hamdan&#8217;s attorneys file a habeas corpus petition.  The government would lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rambles.bearcircle.net/2008/08/09/why-even-bother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

